Dozens of residents associated with Virginia City of Richmond sought out afternoon to protest a proposal for the construction of a casino resort in the city’s Stratford Hills area tuesday.
The proposition had been created by Rhode Island casino operator Bally’s Corporation and had been among the three bids that higher level to another phase of Richmond’s selection process for a casino developer that is preferred.
A crowd of protesters signs that are carrying Tuesday rallied on both edges associated with the city’s Forest Hill Avenue to sound their opposition to Bally’s scheme. They raised issues of various nature, including noise, traffic, and issues that are environmental
One Richmond resident, Jason Haase, said that the gambling resort could disturb wildlife. Mr. Haase, who studies the genealogy of the certain area, additionally noted that the land close to the proposed Bally’s casino website had been when house to a residential district of freed slaves and that community people hidden nearest and dearest here.
According to your Richmond resident, the land had been when owned by Samuel Green and their son Robert Green, who had been people that are free. He further told news that is local that the website Bally’s really wants to build its casino resort on had been when a house website with seven structures and so it additionally most likely includes the Green Family Cemetery.
Mr. Haase noted he really thinks Bally’s should do a professional archaeological study before building its property on a portion of land where there is a high potential to be
home to multiple gravesites
that he is not opposed to a casino in Richmond, but. Being Good NeighborsResponding to residents’ environmental concerns, Bally’s Senior Project Manager for Richmond Michael Monty said in a recent statement that they are committed to “preserving and enhancing the natural beauty of our site, including any wildlife and wetlands.”
As that they have carried out thorough environmental studies and for traffic, Mr. Monty remarked that they’d stop access that is public their property from Forest Hill Avenue.
Of Mr. Haase’s concerns, the Bally’s Richmond official said that they have not “seen any valid sources that would indicate any graves on our site.”(* that they have reviewed a cemetery deed for a property located north of their proposed casino site and) Mr. Monty’s declaration proceeded which they are dedicated to being a “good neighbor”
As mentioned above, Bally’s proposal is one of the three that are still under consideration by Richmond city officials, with plans presented by The Cordish Companies and a partnership between Urban One and Colonial Downs being the other two. (*)Bally’s scheme is the most one that is expensive of three with an estimated (*)$650 million investment(*). The company’s resort should include a hotel, a casino with slots, dining table games and a sportsbook, dining and outlets that are retail and a performance space, among other amenities. (*)It is up to city officials to decide which one of the three developers in the race will be selected as their casino that is preferred designer. But, Richmond voters have actually the say that is final whether a property of this kind should be built within city limits. They will be able to cast their vote on the matter in a citywide referendum.(*)Source:(* november) Community members protest Bally’s casino plan, one neighbor states it might pave over a burial that is historical, WRIC ABC 8News, April 6, 2021 (*)Related Articles(*)