Rate this post


Due to the reputation of my current weblog post exactly where I reviewed five hands from an EPT occasion, in this weblog post I am going to share with you the final five hands I played for the duration of the final two levels of day 1a of the $three,500 purchase-in Globe Poker Tour Borgata Winter Poker Open. I had a hard seat, with three-time WPT Champion Anthony Zinno and WSOP Major Occasion Champion Joe McKeehen on my left, but I did my very best. I will give my evaluation of each and every predicament to let you know precisely why I produced each and every play. Would you have played these hands I played them? Let me know in the comments section beneath.

Hand 1

At 250/500-75, a tight aggressive amateur raised to 1,200 out of his 50,000 stack from 2nd position. A loose aggressive kid with 35,000 named from the hijack. I, with 107,000, named on the button with Jc-7c. The major blind also named. The flop came Qc-Js-4c. Every person checked to the hijack who bet two,200 into the five,725 pot. I raised to five,100. Only the hijack named. The turn was the (Qc-Js-4c)-4h. The hijack checked, I bet four,200 into the 15,925 pot, and he named. The river was the (Qc-Js-4c-4h)-4d. The hijack bet 1,500 into the 24,325 pot and I named, losing to Kh-Qd.

My preflop contact is speculative, but I believed the initial raiser would stack off poorly postflop anytime he has an more than pair or leading pair. This is a massive implied odds predicament for me as lengthy as I am disciplined sufficient to not shed significantly when I make leading pair. If I believed the players in the blinds would regularly reraise, I would have folded preflop.

With middle pair and a flush draw, I can go a handful of various directions. I can either contact the hijack’s bet intending to contact the turn and fold on the river if I do not boost. I can also turn my hand into a semi-bluff by raising, which is a great play if I believe I can make my opponent fold every single hand worse than an more than pair, which really should be pretty much his complete variety, by the river. I believed this certain opponent would not want to stack off with leading pair. I was also unsure if he would be prepared to triple barrel as a bluff if I named the flop and turn, which means I may perhaps make incorrect folds on the river if I contact on the flop and turn.

When deciding how significantly to raise, I can either raise compact, intending to triple barrel on most boards, or I can raise substantial, possibly to 7,000, intending to go all-in on most turns. I believe each plays are fine, but in basic, I choose lines that give me various streets of fold equity. Taking this line when I have premium hands also extracts extra worth from marginal produced hands.

On the turn, I decided to bet compact since I didn’t believe my opponent would fold any produced hand to any bet, and I presently have all the draws in undesirable shape. By betting compact, I do not place my stack in drawing thin versus produced hands while extracting a bit of worth from worse draws. It is unfortunate that the turn severely diminishes the quantity of premium worth hands I can have (it is now very hard to have four-four) but I believe barreling is nonetheless fine. Against powerful opponents, you often have to be conscious of your variety. In this spot, my worth variety is very tiny, which indicates I really should also have reasonably handful of bluffs in my variety.

If my opponent checked to me on the river, I would have checked behind since I do not believe any individual is folding a Queen or improved to any bet and I beat or chop with most other hands. When my opponent produced a micro- bet, providing me wonderful odds, I believe calling is the only choice. I am unsure if I am really obtaining the correct pot odds to justify a contact, but it is likely close. I viewed as turning my hand into a bluff, but I believed it was also most likely my opponent was creating a tiny bet to induce me to raise with quads or possibly with a complete residence he had no intention to fold to any quantity of aggression. Probably I really should have attempted the bluff.

Hand two

At 250/500-75, every person folded to me and I raised to 1,300 out of my 50,000 helpful stack from the cutoff with 6s-6d. Only the major blind, a planet-class, difficult player named. The flop came 7s-5c-4s. My opponent checked, I bet 1,600 into the two,850 pot, and he named. The turn was the (7s-5c-4s)-7c. My opponent bet three,200 into the six,50 pot, I raised to 7,400, and he named. The river was the (7s-5c-4s-7c)-3s. We each checked and I beat Tc-Td.

My preflop raise and flop continuation bet are totally typical. It is worth mentioning that I anticipated my opponent to fight challenging for most pots on boards containing mainly middle cards. I didn’t strategy to fold to any affordable quantity of flop or turn aggression. I believe my opponent’s flop verify-calling variety is very wide, possibly like hands as weak as Qc-9c and 9c-8s, while he may perhaps elect to verify-raise with these.

I wasn’t also shocked when my opponent led into me on the turn. I believe his variety is very wide, like all his draws, powerful produced hands, and possibly his marginal produced hands. I decided to raise compact to extract worth from the draws and marginal produced hands though also creating it significantly much less most likely that I face a river bet, which means I will see a low-priced showdown when I come about to be beat.

If my opponent was a reasonably simple player, I would have worth bet with my rivered straight with the intention of folding if verify-raised. Having said that, because my opponent is a planet-class, difficult player, I decided to verify behind. Specially when your opponent will be unlikely to contact a worth bet with lots of worse produced hands, if you really should strongly contemplate checking behind on the river if you will be unsure how to react if you get verify-raised.

Hand three

At 300/600-75, every person folded to me and I raised to 1,600 out of my 107,000 stack from the hijack. The compact blind, the very same difficult, planet-class player with 32,000 named. The major blind, a tight aggressive kid who was frequently in line reraised to five,100 out of his 21,000 stack. I reraised to 20,000. Each my opponents folded.

My preflop raise is totally typical. I was a bit concerned that the compact blind may perhaps have a premium variety, but I knew he tends to see a flop with a wide variety of hands that flop nicely. This produced me discount premium hands from his variety, while he could undoubtedly have them (or a hand like 9-9 or A-Q that he would not fold). The major blind’s reraise looked very powerful, but I got the vibe that he was attempting to take benefit of a somewhat clear squeeze chance. I had been reasonably active and was not facing significantly aggression. The major blind undoubtedly had a snug image. I produced the assumption that the major blind would realize he have to appear tight and have the courage to get out of line. Although placing in 33 major blinds with 7-7 is not excellent, I believe properly going all-in in this predicament is somewhat typical. Even when I get named, I will have a decent quantity of equity versus each players’ ranges. Fortunately, they folded.

Hand four

At 300/600-75, a loose aggressive kid raised to 1,300 out of his 80,000 stack from the lojack. I, with 117,000, reraised to three,100 from the cutoff with Qd-Td. Only the lojack named. The flop came Js-4h-3h. The lojack checked, I bet two,500 into the 7,775 pot, and he called. The turn was the (Js-4h-3h)-6c. The lojack checked, I bet 7,000 into the 12,775 pot and he called. The river was the (Js-4h-3h-6c)-Th. We each checked and I beat 8c-8d.

Although I had been somewhat active preflop, I had been completely in line preflop when it came to reraising (mainly since I didn’t have lots of premium hands when a person raised in front of me). I decided this was a decent opportunity to get a tiny out of line and apply stress to a loose aggressive kid who seemed to be raising far more than his fair share. I utilised a compact preflop reraise sizing to hopefully make him believe my variety was abnormally powerful, while that assumption is somewhat optimistic.

On the flop, I decided to make a compact bet, once again representing an abnormally powerful variety. In basic, on somewhat dry boards, the preflop reraiser really should bet compact since most of the time, the caller has a significantly weaker variety than the reraiser. This indicates that, on typical, the reraiser really should not thoughts providing the caller excellent odds since the caller will regularly be crushed. It really should be produced clear that I would play all of my hands in this precise manner in this spot.

I decided to ramp up my bet size on the turn to hopefully make my opponent fold all the things in addition to leading pair and draws. If he named my turn bet, I was going to be completed with the hand unless the river was a non-heart more than card (these cards really should be superb for my variety and undesirable for my opponent’s variety, creating them somewhat mandatory bluffs).

When I enhanced to middle pair on the river, I assumed I had the worst hand most of the time (I shed to all flushes and leading pairs). Having said that, because I beat a handful of beneath pairs and a handful of straight draws, I decided to verify. I do not believe betting as a bluff has any merit since it is also most likely my opponent has a flush or leading pair that he will contact with every single time.

All in all, I got owned on this hand.

Hand five

At 300/600-75, every person folded to me on the button and I raised to 1,300 out of my 130,000 stack with Qh-9s. A splashy amateur with 13,000 named from the compact blind and a planet-class loose aggressive player with 20,000 named from the major blind. The flop came Tc-7h-3c. We all checked. The turn was the (Tc-7h-3c)-Js. The compact blind checked, the major blind bet two,500 into the four,575 pot, and each I and the compact blind named. The river was the (Tc-7h-3c-Js)-Qc. The compact blind checked, the major blind bet 10,000 into the 12,75 pot. I folded and the compact blind named, losing to the major blind’s 5c-4c.

I believe my preflop raise is fine. I believed if I raised bigger, possibly to 1,600, each the brief stacks in the blinds would be significantly far more inclined to reraise or fold. Considering the fact that I had a hand that flops reasonably nicely, I would significantly choose my opponents contact or fold, compared to reraise or fold. Having said that, after I choose a bet size in this situation, I have a tendency to stick with it for a though. I do not believe it is a great notion to differ your bet size primarily based on your hand’s strength, in particular against superb opponents.

I decided to verify behind on the flop since I have nothing at all. I also got the vibe that the compact blind liked his hand. Facing a affordable bet on the turn, I decided to contact due to the roughly break-even pot odds plus implied odds. I do not believe raising has significantly merit since it is also most likely that the brief stacks will contact off with any leading pair hand that has me drawing thin.

On the river facing a substantial bet, I assumed the major blind had a powerful hand most of the time as bluffing into two players who could simply have a flush is not a great notion. Facing a player who produced a substantial bet and a player whose verify does not say significantly about his hand’s strength, it is just also most likely that 1 of my two opponents has me beat. The compact blind named relatively rapidly, which tends to make me believe he have to have had at least two pair. This was a entertaining hand!

barceloneta-beach-9660I hope you enjoyed this weblog post. If you want far more coaching content material like this, I recommend you verify out my exclusive webinar exactly where I evaluation every single important hand I played that led to me taking 7th spot out of 512 players in a current European Poker Tour side occasion for €29,000.

Please let me know what you believe about this form of weblog post in the comments section or on twitter @JonathanLittle. Be certain to verify back subsequent week for a further educational weblog post. If you want to support me out, please inform your good friends about my weblog! Thanks for reading and great luck in your games!