Rate this post

Just after Daniel Negreanu made a nuclear winter across Twitter with a series of opinions that a substantial swathe of the poker neighborhood met with sarcasm and scorn, Lee Davy, tries to figure out why he continues to bother, why men and women react and far more.

Some men and women
grind away
generating their
the ultimate
of their
they are
by way of
their only
to meet
a different
particular person

– Downers, by Charles Bukowski.

I cannot place it off any longer.

I’m procrastinating mainly because I’m afraid. I practically applied the word ‘terrified’ – a tad melodramatic – but that is the word my melancholy wanted to use.

I applied to adore writing opinion pieces. Handful of men and women have been undertaking it. A point of differentiation. A way of getting much less like the other swans, swimming in this pool of poker, a location exactly where, on occasions, it can really feel ice cold.

I create four-five pieces per day.

Nothing at all.

It is like I do not exist.

The feeling of getting lost, like a ‘Williams’, desperately leaping out of the Yellow Pages, confirmed, with the stab of a fountain pen applied to accentuate the complete cease, driven by way of the paper, and deep into your thigh bone like a needle looking for marrow.

The pointlessness of it all is not lost on me. I have spent a lifetime tricking men and women into pondering that I have skills and capacities I lack. Like an errant eyelash in a burrito, I do not want to be discovered out. I do not want men and women to see how clueless, and unsophisticated I actually am.

An opinion piece is unique.

It feels like you are writing it utilizing a trumpet rather of a pen. It is Leftfield noisy, and if you do it properly, it elicits good feedback on Twitter that you can package into a pill, swallow it, and retain the imposter syndrome feeling at bay, a small although longer.

Then there is the hate.

It is incorrect for me to say that the poker market is far more or much less hateful than any other market when it comes to the passive-aggressive tact of firing a missile or two at an opponent from behind their laptop or mobile telephone five,000 miles away from the target, mainly because I have by no means knowledgeable THIS in any other format.

That is untrue.

I have.

I exist inside a different bubble, 1 that pops when the addict drinks alcohol. Anytime I press ‘publish’ and blow so tough on a podcast, weblog post or point of view that it spreads about my globe like winged seeds, grace and gratitude meet my opinions.

Not right here.

Not in poker.

In a sense it is a fantastic issue. I’d adore to have a philosophers’ picnic, and dip my toes into the river although a person else cuts my theories and thoughts apart like the cucumber that is getting a new house in in between molar 1 and molar two.

Poker is unique.

It is no picnic, that is for positive.

Yesterday, an interview that I performed with Andrew Robl hit the airwaves. The discussion was unique, vulnerable, and inspirational. As I watched it on YouTube, I noticed 4 thumbs down. I sent a hyperlink to my wife on Whatsapp, with this message.

“An interview has come out in between Andrew Robl and me. Can you verify the comments to see if I am going to puke if I study them x.”

I cannot deal with the hate any longer.

I cannot even deal with the minor disagreements.

Doubling 140-characters is nonetheless as well several moves away from the best choreography necessary to get the point across, but it appears to be the best quantity for a hypodermic needle point complete of sarcasm and scorn.

I sense a thing else takes place when I create an opinion piece. I drop men and women. Critical men and women. Individuals that you want me to interview, but will not respond with a straightforward ‘yes’, ‘no’ or ‘fuck-off’ when I make contact with them mainly because they have study a thing I have written and decided that these 1,000 words define every thing about who I am from my ethics, morals, values, beliefs – every thing.

So I duck and dive.

I do not do it any longer.

Till, now.

Daniel Negreanu

I am envious of Daniel Negreanu.

Individuals think ‘envy’ is a shameful, embarrassing feeling, and to share it with the globe suggests you are a sleeping bag quick of a cracking camping trip.

I am envious of his house, his economic status, his network, his service, his talent, his experiences – previous, present and future, and I will not be alone.

I’m not envious of the shitstorm he faced this previous week when tweeting his thoughts on what constitutes a ‘bad’ and ‘good’ poker player, his views on taking 100% duty for your actions, and views on loaning revenue.

I picked up my machete, and began to hack by way of the noise, and noticed lots of phlegm hanging from most of the threads. It all seemed a bit a lot, and mainly because of that I wondered what was actually going on? My thoughts only came up with far more inquiries.

Why does Daniel Negreanu go by way of the discomfort of posting his views on Twitter? It is not only Daniel. Cate Hall is a different polarising instance of a person who continued to share her views on pretty much every thing, and at the similar time, possessing to deal with the blowback.

Tony Robbins believes our actions either take us towards pleasure or away from discomfort. Does this imply that Daniel, Cate and any one else who continues to use Twitter as a communication tool in spite of getting the equivalent of ‘real world’ punches in the face enjoys the mayhem?

Is there pleasure in the discomfort?

‘No far more fiendish punishment could be devised, have been such a issue physically doable, than that 1 need to be turned loose in society and stay certainly unnoticed by all the members thereof. If no 1 turned about when we entered, answered when we spoke, or minded what we did, but if every single particular person we met “cut us dead”, and acted as if we have been non-existent factors, a type of rage and impotent despair would ahead of lengthy properly up in us, from which the cruellest bodily torture would be a relief.’

I pinched that from the opening of Alain de Botton’s book ’Status Anxiousness,’ exactly where the philosopher suggests that maybe our drive to boost, sustain or reduce our status is heavily linked to our search for adore.

If this is correct, then maybe men and women who use Twitter to ‘gain attention’ do so mainly because subconsciously they know that beyond the discomfort of the repeated mortar attacks lies the adore of getting believed of as a person worthy of hitting. Just after all, you can only hit a person you can see, and do not we want men and women to see us?


You cannot argue with biology we want to be likeable. The positive aspects of belonging to a tribe are properly noted. Harley Davidson turns outsiders into beloved insiders, Deadheads followed Garcia everywhere, and we all know of the advantage of belonging to the appropriate tribe in poker.

It is demoralising, disconcerting and disturbing to discover that you have enemies.

There is a scene in The Simpsons when Lisa breaks Ralph’s heart that reminded me of the war of words in between Shaun Deeb and Daniel, with Daniel playing the function of Ralph, and the Planet Series of Poker (WSOP) Player of the Year donning that dress once again to be Lisa.

Throughout the thunder and lightning that accompanied Daniel’s views on loaning revenue, Deeb wrote: ‘Can’t wait till two years this tweet is about divorce.’

Daniel responds more than a series of tweets, which I have merged into 1 statement: ‘That’s a quite shitty tweet even for you, Shaun. What compels you to create that? Tasteless and classless. Like, what is the point? Going for laughs?”

Daniel even asked him to apologise so they could each move previous it.

Nothing at all.

Was this posturing Daniel’s way of attempting to remove an enemy ahead of he became 1? Just after all, an enemy desires to humiliate us and make us appear stupid.

And what’s going on with the enemies?

Why do they really feel the want to respond, and I’m not speaking about the men and women who do so in the spirit of attempting (as not possible as it is on Twitter) to have a productive debate. I’m speaking about the men and women who go for the jugular.

In the College of Life’s classic book ‘Who am I?’ there is a chapter on enemies, that ends with a series of inquiries for the reader to answer.

Possibly you could answer them oneself?

What do you assume motivates them {enemies}. Are they appropriate or peculiar to hate you?

What may possibly have gone incorrect for them in the previous that they are taking out on you, now?

Name 5 of your largest enemies across your life. Do they have something in frequent in their accusations?


Anytime I am upset about a thing, I can normally comply with the breadcrumbs to a scared younger me, holding a stale piece of bread, in a car or truck park, hunting for the duck pond.

It is like a person is holding a mirror in front of me, and I can see myself behaving in the similar way as the particular person I am about hurl 280-characters of abuse at.

I cannot aid but assume this is taking place to Daniel.

You do not have to plug these ramblings into PioSOLVER to figure out that 1 of the 5 factors that you can discover in frequent amongst the abuse is Daniel’s faith and help in PokerStars, in spite of their selection to finish the Supernova Elite system horrendously and unacceptably.

When PokerStars chose to finish the system in that brutal way, I picture these impacted felt like Stars had zero integrity. In breaches of trust like this, it is difficult to mend the broken partnership. When Daniel comes out and defends these that have wronged you, I comprehend why he then falls into your crosshairs.

But there are factors I do not comprehend.

One particular of the most frequent themes I study in messages of hate towards Daniel is that he’s a shill who earnings from a corporation that in the eyes of the haters, has zero integrity.

But so are you.

And you.

And you.

The French philosopher, Jean-Paul Sartre, had integrity.

Negreanu, Stars, enemies: musings on bad faith and why we do the things we do?In 1964, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature, but refused it mainly because he believed the award was ‘capitalist’ and ‘bourgeois.’ One particular thought, that Sartre was renowned for was the phenomenon current without having definitely taking freedom on board, and he referred to as this ‘living in terrible faith.’

According to Sartre’s thought, we exist in ‘bad faith’ when we think we have to take up a specific job or profession, continue to reside in the freezing wet cold or share a bed with a miserable cold-hearted bar steward all mainly because we assume we have no other decision.

Every time you log on to play on PokerStars, you develop income for them you are swelling the numbers, and are a walking, speaking billboard.

And it is not only online.

Turn up at a PokerStars Reside occasion, and you are undertaking the similar issue, even if you refuse to take a winner’s shot holding a shiny version of their logo in your hand, with the corporation slogan, brand and symbols standing tall and proud behind you.

Is this not terrible faith?

Aid me see, how this behaviour is unique from Daniel’s when it comes to the distinct point of profiting from PokerStars, and please do not inform me that you are benefiting from the player mainly because they wouldn’t be there is it wasn’t for the occasion. And do not inform me that you want to be there mainly because you have bills to play as several qualified poker players do fine without having playing online or reside at PokerStars.

This phenomenon does not cease with Stars.

We hope that sports betting becomes legalised in the USA mainly because it tends to make it a lot easier for poker to comply with suit. That hope is like the final leaf of Autumn, crisp and yellow, clinging onto a branch with a twister on the way following the Division of Justice reconsidered its 2011 opinion that the Wire Act only applied to sports betting.

Card Player ran with the headline: ‘Sheldon Adelson Gets His Way, Division of Justice Says All Online Gambling Illegal,’ ahead of going on to clarify how Adelson has poured millions into the Coalition to Quit Web Gambling, which by default, stops online poker.

Online poker is a bird with a broken wing.

Sheldon Adelson is a hungry cat.

So why do we play in his poker space?

Like I mentioned, far more inquiries, and I will leave with a handful of far more to summarise my points.

Why do men and women continue to use social media when it causes so a lot emotional discomfort and suffering and requires up so a lot of our time?

If you profit from PokerStars by playing in their online or reside tournaments, why is this any unique from Negreanu benefiting from them as an employee? If it is uncomplicated for him to quit, why do not you?

And a reminder.

The objective of this piece is to develop a debate.

Like Daniel, I do not want hate.